IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13385 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Baleshwar Sahni S/o Late Munilal Sahni, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 2. Amarkant Kumar Sahni, S/o Baleshwar Sahni, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 3. Mithun Sahni, Son of Baleshwar Sahni, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 4. Lutan Sahni, S/o Kala Sahni, R/o Village Madudabad, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 5. Okil Sahani, S/o Laddu Lal Sahni, R/o Village - Rahepur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 6. Ramnath Sahni, S/o Ramesh Sahani, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 7. Tapeshwar Sahani, S/o Munni Lal Sahani, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 8. Dharmpal Kumar, S/o Ganga Sahni, R/o Village Narayanpur, P.O.- Tetarpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chairman, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Bihar. 2. The Vice Chairman, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Bihar. 3. The Collector, Samastipur. 4. The Block Development Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. 5. The Anchaladhikari, Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist.- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr Singh ( Gp 26 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 11 02-04-2025 There is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner when this matter was called on 12.12.2024 and 19.03.2025. Thereafter, it has been specifically posted under the caption 'For Orders'. Patna High Court CWJC No.13385 of 2023(11) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition. 3. Having regard to the same, the matter is dismissed for non prosecution. Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U