SHEHZAD ALIAS KALU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
C482/962/2024 · 2025-04-23
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7119 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7119 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.962 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, AGA and Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, Brief Holder for the State.
3. None present for respondent no.3.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants want to withdraw the present C482 application enabling him to file compounding application before the trial court as all the offences imputed against the applicants are compoundable.
5. The permission, so made, is granted.
6. The C482 application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, applicants may file compounding application before the learned trial court in accordance with law.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
23.04.2025 AK