- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42327 WP No. 9358 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 9358 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: LALITHA URS W/O S.SHRIKANT RAJE URS AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.434, 8TH CROSS, SAMMARGA, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, MYSORE- 570 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN B.K.,ADVOCATE) AND: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PCIT BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALURU 560 095. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 06.02.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ORDER NO. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1072974499(1) (ANNX-B). DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO DO THE NEEDFUL TO ENABLE THE PETITIONER TO FILE THE RETURN OF INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE IN THE WEBSITE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42327 WP No. 9358 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order at Annexure – B dated 06.02.2025 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 119(2)(b) seeking condonation of delay of 121 days in filing the income tax returns in relation to the Assessment Year 2022-23 was rejected by the respondent. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in relation to the aforesaid Assessment Year 2022-23, the petitioner who is the wife of the deceased Assessee filed returns of the petitioner after the prescribed period along with the application seeking condonation of delay interalia owing to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, the petitioner was not in a position to file the returns within a prescribed period - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42327 WP No. 9358 of 2025 and as such the delay deserves to be set aside. It was contended that delay in filing the returns was due to genuine hardship as contemplated in the Circular No.9/2015. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents would support the impugned order and submit that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that the respondents have adopted hyper technical approach in refusing the condone the delay of 121 days which is sought to be explained without appreciating that due to the demise of the Assessee, the petitioner herein who is the wife of the Assessee filed the returns of the petitioner belatedly and on account of bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause constituting genuine hardship on the part of the petitioner to file the IT returns within a prescribed period, the petitioner was entitled to seek condonation of delay and failure to appreciate this, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42327 WP No. 9358 of 2025 has resulted in erroneous conclusion warranting interference by this Court in the present petition. 6. Under these circumstances, adopting justice oriented approach and having regard to valid and sufficient ground pleaded by the petitioner in support of her claim for condonation of delay, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and condone the delay in filing the returns by the petitioner. 7. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed. (ii) The impugned order at Annexure – B dated 06.02.2025, is hereby set aside. (iii) The application filed by the petitioner under Section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay of 121 days in filing IT returns for the AY 2022-23, is hereby allowed. (iv) The respondent/respondents is/are directed to accept the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42327 WP No. 9358 of 2025 returns submitted by the petitioner for the aforesaid Assessment Year 2022-23. (v) It is needless to state that upon receiving the IT returns, the respondent is at liberty to verify the claim of the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BSV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11