Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71184 (PNJ)

RAM SUKH AND ORS v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH AND ANR

CWP/5767/2016 · 2025-08-18

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CWP-5767-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 Ram Sukh and others …Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the petitioners Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Jaivir S. Chandail, Additional Standing Counsel for U.T., Chandigarh-respondent Nos.2 and 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. On 29.04.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and in the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned. Even today, there is no change in the situation. The matter is pending before this Court since 2016 and it cannot be kept pending for an indefinite period. It appears that with the efflux of time, the petitioners have lost their interest to pursue the present petition. 2. In the backdrop, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to move an appropriate application within three months if cause survives. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 18.08.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.18 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.