Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71182 (PNJ)

GURDIP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/26846/2017 · 2025-05-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 215 Gurdip Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. raised in the present petition P-10, has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation expeditiously, in accordance with law. 20.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurdip Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 28.03.2017, Annexure has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation expeditiously, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26846-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, for the petitioner. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim representation dated 28.03.2017, Annexure has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 28.03.2017, (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.