Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106822 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6534 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raju Gupta Respondent :- Smt Brijesh And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bindeshwari Prasad Mishra,Chandra Prakash Tripathi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:
"i. Allow the Petition, directing the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Mathura to decide the suit for 7C in Case No. 376 of 2025 (Raju Gupta and others Vs. Smt. Brijesh and others), pending before Court Civil Judge Junior Division, Mathura. ii. Allow the Petition, directing the respondents to not interfere in the peaceful possession over the property of the petitioner and maintain the status quo till disposal of the suit."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (7C Application) is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Mathura to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (7C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad