HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3116 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the compromise has arrived at between the parties on 26.11.2024, by which both parties have settled their disputes amicably in respect of complaint filed under Section 138 N.I. Act and a sum of Rs. 6 lacs has been paid to opp. party no. 2, which is accepted and acknowledged by the learned counsel for opp. party no. 2. 2. In the said compromise, it is also stated that no dispute survives after making payment of Rs. 6 lacs to opp. party no. 2. 3. Since the offence under Section 138 N.I.Act is compoundable offence and the same is compounded, no further order is required to be passed in the matter. 4. In view of the above, revision stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 Gss Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Aditya Prasad Mishra, Dinesh Kumar Tripathi, Syed Shahnawaz Shah, Vijay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohammad Yaseen, Saurabh Kesarwani, Siblu Panday (Harvir Singh,J.) Abdul Rahman .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad