NITIN MANAWAT AND ANR. v. WEST BENGAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
WPA/30622/2024 · 2025-11-11
Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71167 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71167 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.11.2025 11 sdas WPA 30622 of 2024
Nitin Manawat & Anr. Vs. West Bengal Pollution Control Board
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Biswaroop Mukherjee Mr. Arkodeb Sinha Mr. Mainak Biswas Ms. Simran More …. for the petitioners
Mr. N. C. Bihani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumya Mukherjee …. for the WBPCB
1. Let affidavit-of-competency as filed in Court be kept on record.
2. The apprehension of the petitioners, that they have been blacklisted on account of an alleged deviation from the contractual terms, is completely belied by the respondent.
3. Mr. Bihani, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the respondent, states that he has received a communication from his client that no such blacklisting of the petitioners has been made and the apprehension is unwarranted.
4. A copy of such communication dated November 10, 2025 is kept on record.
5. The petitioners, thus, have no further grievance in this matter.
2
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)