Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71165 (KAR)

SRI RAVI K v. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI B N

RPFC/79/2021 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27367 RPFC No. 79 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 79 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SRI. RAVI K. SON OF SRI. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.13/4, 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VALMIKI NAGAR, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 026. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI B.N. WIFE OF K. RAVI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. KUMARI RAMITHA R. DAUGHTER OF K. RAVI, AGED ABOUT 6 ½ YEARS, BOTH THE RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDING AT NO.15/1, 9TH MAIN ROAD, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560 054. RESPONDENT NO.2 IS MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI B.N., THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN. …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R2 & R3 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY R1) Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27367 RPFC No. 79 of 2021 THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 13.03.2020 MADE IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.46/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU AWARDING MAINTENANCE OF RS.10.000=00 TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT AND RS.5,000=00 TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT PER MONTH FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER AND DISMISS THE SAID PETITION IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed stating that the parties have amicably settled their dispute before the Karnataka Mediation Centre, Bangalore. 2. The proceeding sheet dated 21.12.2021 indicates that in view of the settlement before the Karnataka Mediation Centre and since both the parties have consented for closure of the appeal, the same is disposed of and the Memorandum of Settlement is made part of the order. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27367 RPFC No. 79 of 2021 3. Considering the same, nothing survives for consideration. In the light of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 154