SULOCHANA W/O MANIKRAO BAHIR v. DNYANOBA S/O JAYSING SAPKAL
CRA/220/2025 · 2025-11-03
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71141 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71141 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
53 CRA 220 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CRA NO. 220 OF 2025 SULOCHANA W/O MANIKRAO BAHIR VERSUS DNYANOBA S/O JAYSING SAPKAL ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Thombre Chandrakant V. ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 03.11.2025 PER COURT : The petitioner has an alternate efficacious statutory remedy of preferring appeal under Section 385 read with Section 388 of the Indian Succession Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
2. Leave is granted.
3. The Revision is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum as permissible in law. Time consumed in prosecuting the present petition shall be taken into consideration while condoning the delay.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:30204