Sr. No. 40 Suppl. Cause List. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP No. 414/2019 Ishtiyaq Ahmad …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Nissar Ahmad Bhat, Adv. Vs. State of JK & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Syed Musaib, Dy. AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE O R D E R 03.01.2025 When this matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondents submits that he had instructions that the respondents would proceed in this matter afresh in accordance with the provisions of law. He submits that though notices have been issued, however, while issuing notice, the same has been issued under Section 4 instead of Section 5 and accordingly the notice was required to be issued under Section 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, this petition is allowed. Respondents are permitted to proceed afresh in accordance with law within a period of one month. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 03.01.2025 Altaf Mohd Altaf Nima I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 03.01.2025