Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71135 (ALL)

VIJAYEE AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/21060/2025 · 2025-07-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107128 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21060 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijayee And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushal Kishor Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for Gaon Sabha, as to the maintainability of the writ petition by stating that against the order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the petitioner has moved a restoration application, which has been rejected. According to him, the petitioner has remedy of filing revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the present writ petition is not maintainable. 2. In view of the said fact, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. 3. However, in case the petitioner prefers revision within 15 days from today, the revisional authority shall not go into the question of limitation and shall decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 4. Registry is directed to return certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner's counsel within 48 hours. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad