Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71134 (ALL)

MISHRILAL v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/8890/2025 · 2025-07-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107470 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8890 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mishrilal Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Man Bahadur Singh,Saurabh Kumar,Shivendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " I.To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no. 4, District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh, to grant one Notional Increment to the petitioner, which became due on 01.07.2003 and to revise the petitioner's pension and other benefits accordingly, and to pay the arrears of pension and other consequential benefits payable to him from 01.07.2003, along with interest, in accordance with the judgment dated 11.04.2023 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Director (Administration and HR), KPTCL and Others v. C.P. Mundinamani and Others and the Government Orders dated 12.06.2024 and 25.09.2024 (Annexure No. 1), within such stipulated period as may be specified by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing counsel for the State- respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.4 District Inspector of Schools within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad