Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7113 (RAJ)

JAI PRAKASH MEENA @ J. P. MEENA S/O RAMPRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2262/2025 · 2025-02-14

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6752] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2262/2025 Jai Prakash Meena @ J.P. Meena S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Nandlalpura, Police Station Kotkhawada, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Mr. Sushil Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.184/2024 registered at Police Station Kotkhavda, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 103(1) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. Charge-sheet has been filed for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 103(1), 190 & 191(3) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner to cause any injury on the person of deceased as well as other injured. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he [2025:RJ-JP:6752] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2262/2025] dropped the co-accused person on a motorcycle near the hotel where the injured and deceased were sleeping. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that prima facie, there is no allegation against the petitioner of causing any injury to anyone; petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Jai Prakash Meena @ J.P. Meena S/o Ramprasad, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:6752] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2262/2025] 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for just decision of the bail and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /45