Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71125 (BOM)

DONDAICHA EDUCATION SOCIETYS DONDAICHA THR ITS PRINCIPAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/15633/2025 · 2025-12-23

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p14 and p-16.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 WRIT PETITION NO.15633 OF 2025 Dondaicha Education Societys Dondaicha Thr Its Principal VERSUS The Union Of India Through Secretary And Others ... Mr. A. C. Sisodiya, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. U. B. Bondar, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. M Phule, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. N. N. Desale, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 16 WRIT PETITION NO.10882 OF 2025 Laxminarayan Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sansthas P.s.b.a. English School VERSUS The Union Of India And Others ... Mr. Satyajit S. Bora, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K. S. Solanke, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 23 DECEMBER 2025 ORDER : . These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. [1] 2025:BHC-AUG:37381-DB p14 and p-16.odt 2. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice for respondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Central Government Counsel waive notice for respondent No.1/Union of India in respective petitions. Learned Advocates Mr. N. N. Desale and Mr. S. R. Dheple waive notice for respondent No.5/Zilla Parishad in respective petitions. 3. We have heard both the sides. 4. We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]