Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71111 (BOM)

DHARAMSING GULABSING PADVI LRS. BABUSING AND OTHERS v. UDAYSING MANSING PADVI LRS PRITHVISING AND OTHERS

CA/13968/2023 · 2025-11-21

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 73-SA.340-18 & ors.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 73 SECOND APPEAL NO. 340 OF 2018 DHARAMSING GULABSING PADVI AND OTHERS VERSUS UDAYSING MANSING PADVI LRS PRITHVISING AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3129 OF 2023 IN SA/590/2018 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 590 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13968 OF 2023 IN SA/340/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16181 OF 2022 IN SA/340/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8945 OF 2018 IN SA/590/2018 ... AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A, 2A, 2C : Mr. V. C. Patil – Physically & Mr. Pritesh Jain (V. C.). Advocate for Applicant/Intervenor CA/3129/2023 : Mr. Yuvraj Choudhari. Advocate for Applicant/Intervenor in CA/8945/2018 : Mr. Mohd Aamir h/f Mr. H. P. Randhir. ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 21.11.2025 PER COURT :- Civil Application No.16181 of 2022 1. Issue notice to the proposed heirs of respondent No.5A, returnable on 06.01.2026. Civil Application No.13968 of 2023 2. Applicants pray for condonation of delay of 95 days in setting aside abatement and bringing legal heirs of applicant No.3 2 73-SA.340-18 & ors.odt 3. The cause of action survives as against the heirs of applicant No.3. The delay is not deliberate. It is desirable to condone the delay. 4. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “A to C”. 5. List other matters on 06.01.2026. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ... vmk/-