21-Criappl-3358-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3358 OF 2025 IN APEALST/9154/2025 Chand Maheboob Sayyed VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ….. Mr. U. S. Mitkari h/f Mr. Kulkarni Mukul S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. D. Wange, APP for Respondent No.1 – State Ms. Smita Chole (Kendre), Advocate for Respondent No.2 ….. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3359 OF 2025 IN APEALST/9154/2025 CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 01.12.2025 PER COURT : [I] Order in Application No.3358/2025: 1. This is the Application for condonation of 333 days delay in preferring the Appeal against conviction. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and the learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 – Victim. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause – ‘A’ and same stands disposed of accordingly. 1 21-Criappl-3358-2025.odt [II] Order in Criminal Appeal : 1. This is the Appeal against conviction. 2. Admit. 3. Issue notice to the Respondents. The learned APP waives service of notice for Respondent No.1 – State and the learned Advocate Ms. Chole waives service of notice for Respondent No.2 - Victim. 4. Call Record and Proceedings with Paper-book. [III] Order in Application No.3359/2025 : 1. This is the Application for suspension of sentence. 2. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable after one [01] weeks. The learned APP waives service of notice for Respondent No.1 and the learned Advocate Ms. Chole waives service of notice for Respondent No.2 – Victim. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/December-2025 2