CRM-M- 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 213 TARSEM SINGH STATE OF CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here Name of Petitioner (s) Tarsem Singh, 2. -33098-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TARSEM SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under: Name of Petitioner FIR No. Date Section(s) 26 25.03.2025 408 IPC On 23.06.2025, following order was passed: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33098-2025 Decided on : 17.09.2025 . . . PETITIONER . . . RESPONDENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Advocate Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First under:- Police Station District Mehtiana Hoshiarpur .2025, following order was passed:- the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Hoshiarpur POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.18 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M- 2 “1. 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder: Name of Petitioner(s) Tarsem Singh 2. complaint dated 18.03.2025, submitted by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Garhshankar. It has been alleged therein that the petitioner, Tarsem Singh, who previously s Cooperative Agriculture Services Society Limited, Ajnoha, Tehsil Garhshankar, committed embezzlement of an amount of said amount was reflected as “cash in hand” in the day book, along with stock of manure, the charge of which was allegedly not handed over to the current Manager of the Society. This alleged embezzlement came to light during an audit of the Society’s records for the period from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2023. interrogation is not warranted in the present case, as the allegations are based entirely on documentary evidence, which is already available with the concerned office. It is further contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and made a scapegoat due to political considerations. bail, as he is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with the authorities. 3. Punjab puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent -33098-2025 1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder: Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No. Date Section(s) 26 25.03.2025 408 IPC The FIR in question has been registered on the basis of a complaint dated 18.03.2025, submitted by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Garhshankar. It has been alleged therein that the petitioner, Tarsem Singh, who previously s Cooperative Agriculture Services Society Limited, Ajnoha, Tehsil Garhshankar, committed embezzlement of an amount of said amount was reflected as “cash in hand” in the day book, along with manure, the charge of which was allegedly not handed over to the current Manager of the Society. This alleged embezzlement came to light during an audit of the Society’s records for the period from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2023. Learned counsel for the petition interrogation is not warranted in the present case, as the allegations are entirely on documentary evidence, which is already available with the concerned office. It is further contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and made a scapegoat due to political considerations. Accordingly, the petitioner prays for the grant of anticipatory bail, as he is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with the authorities. Notice of motion. On advance notice, Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:- Section(s) Police Station District 408 IPC Mehtiana Hoshiarpur The FIR in question has been registered on the basis of a complaint dated 18.03.2025, submitted by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Garhshankar. It has been alleged therein that the petitioner, Tarsem Singh, who previously served as Secretary of the Ajnoha Cooperative Agriculture Services Society Limited, Ajnoha, Tehsil Garhshankar, committed embezzlement of an amount of ₹12,41,638.83. The said amount was reflected as “cash in hand” in the day book, along with manure, the charge of which was allegedly not handed over to the current Manager of the Society. This alleged embezzlement came to light during an audit of the Society’s records for the period from 01.04.2005 to Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that custodial interrogation is not warranted in the present case, as the allegations are entirely on documentary evidence, which is already available with the concerned office. It is further contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and made a scapegoat due to political considerations. Accordingly, the petitioner prays for the grant of anticipatory bail, as he is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with advance notice, Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent – State. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Hoshiarpur The FIR in question has been registered on the basis of a complaint dated 18.03.2025, submitted by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Garhshankar. It has been alleged therein that the erved as Secretary of the Ajnoha Cooperative Agriculture Services Society Limited, Ajnoha, Tehsil 12,41,638.83. The said amount was reflected as “cash in hand” in the day book, along with manure, the charge of which was allegedly not handed over to the current Manager of the Society. This alleged embezzlement came to light during an audit of the Society’s records for the period from 01.04.2005 to er submits that custodial interrogation is not warranted in the present case, as the allegations are entirely on documentary evidence, which is already available with the concerned office. It is further contended that the petitioner has been falsely Accordingly, the petitioner prays for the grant of anticipatory bail, as he is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with advance notice, Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.18 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M- 3 4. 5. investigation as and when required to do so by the the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The under Section 6. passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing th possess any passport. trial, petitioner would seek prior permission of the Court 3. contends that in compliance of the order dated Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bai order. 4. averment made by learned counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation on custodial interrogation of the petitioner i investigation. 5. -33098-2025 Adjourned to 17.09.2025. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when required to do so by the the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail, to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). Besides, it is directed that petitioner would hand over his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing th possess any passport. It is also directed that before leaving country any time during trial, petitioner would seek prior permission of the Court Continuing his submissions, l contends that in compliance of the order dated Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bai Learned State counsel on instructions, confirms the said averment made by learned counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation on 04.09.2025, by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner i investigation. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when required to do so by the Investigating Agency. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail, to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting petitioner shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). Besides, it is directed that petitioner would hand over his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not It is also directed that before leaving country any time during trial, petitioner would seek prior permission of the Court”. Continuing his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance of the order dated 23.06.2025, passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co-operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bai Learned State counsel on instructions, confirms the said averment made by learned counsel for the petitioner of joining the , by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the Investigating Agency. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail, to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting petitioner shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down Besides, it is directed that petitioner would hand over his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. e fact that he does not It is also directed that before leaving country any time during earned counsel for the petitioner .2025, passed by this operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bail Learned State counsel on instructions, confirms the said averment made by learned counsel for the petitioner of joining the , by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, s not required for the purpose of POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.18 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M- 4 6. custodial interrogation is no more required 23.06.2025, passed by this present petition is allowed. and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 7. September 1 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: -33098-2025 Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required .06.2025, passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, present petition is allowed. However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of September 17, 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and interim bail order dated Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid (SANJAY VASHISTH) POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.18 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document