Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7108 (KAR)

SHRI BASAVARAJ S/O SIDDAPPA GUNDALURU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/105427/2024 · 2025-03-20

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5152 WP No. 105427 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 105427 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. BASAVARAJ S/O SIDDAPPA GUNDALURU, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GUNDALURU CHAWL, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 102. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. RAWOOT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BAILHONGAL, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL CUNCIL, BAILHONGAL, TQ: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 102. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, AGA FOR R1-R2; R3-DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5152 WP No. 105427 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Santosh B.Rawoot., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation/ request made by the petitioner dated: 24.04.2024 vide Annexure-D. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. AGA on instructions submits that a memo has been filed stating that the representation submitted by the petitioner on 24.04.2024 has been considered and accordingly an endorsement was issued on 12.11.2024. AGA therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by AGA and the memo is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5152 WP No. 105427 of 2024 5. Because of consideration of the representation submitted by the petitioner, nothing survives for consideration at this juncture. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK,MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 76