Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 71073 (ORI)

SALMAN KHOSLA v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMC/3707/2025 · 2025-09-25

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.3707 of 2025 1) Salman Khosla ..... Petitioners 2) Sukanta Khosla Represented By Adv. - T. Narayana Murty -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opp. Party Represented By Adv. – S.K. Parhi, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 25.09.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State- Opposite Party. Perused the materials placed before this Court. 3. The Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 19.05.2025 on which date the non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against them by the learned S.D.J.M., Koraput in G.R. Case No.23 of 2022. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that initially the Petitioners were on bail on 10.04.2023. After which the Petitioners were appearing before the learned Court in seisin over the matter after they were released on bail. However, on one of the dates fixed for appearance, due to communication gap with their lawyer, the Petitioners were unable to appear. Since no step was taken to represent the petitioners by the counsel appearing for them. Page 2 of 2. Thereafter, a non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the Petitioners. It was further contended that for the laches on the part of the counsel, the parties should not be allowed to suffer. Therefore, being aggrieved by such order the Petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash order dated 19.05.2025. 4. On perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the trial court has not committed any illegality, however, in the larger interests of justice and in order to provide another opportunity to the Petitioners, this Court deems it proper to set aside the order dated 19.05.2025 by the learned S.D.J.M., Koraput in G.R. Case No.23 of 2022, subject to payment of a cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) by each of the Petitioners to the Advocates’ Welfare Fund of Local Bar Association within fifteen days and furnishing money receipt thereof in proof of deposit. Further, it is directed that the Petitioners shall appear before the learned S.D.J.M., Koraput within four weeks from today along with a copy of today’s order and shall continue to participate in the proceeding without any further default. In the event, the Petitioners make any further default in appearance, it is open to the Court in seisin over the matter to take necessary coercive steps against the Petitioners. 5. In such view of the matter, the CRLMC is allowed. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer