Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 275 OF 2014 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI. M.R. NAGENDRA AGED 63 YEARS SON OF LATE M.R. RAJANNA RESIDENT OF NO.22, 4TH A STREET K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
1(a) SMT.NAGARATHNA.R AGED 61 YEARS WIFE OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA
1(b) MS.SHREELAKSHMI M.N AGED 26 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA
1(c) MS.RASHMI M.N AGED 24 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE M.R.NAGENDRA
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF RESIDENT OF NO.22, 4TH A STREET K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. N. JAGADISH BALIGA, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. R. VENUGOPAL S/O RAJARAM GUPTA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS M/S. VENUGOPAL SWAMY AND COMPANY BUTTER AND GHEE MERCHANT K.R. ROAD, OPP VANIVILAS HOSPITAL BANGALORE - 560 002 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE)
Page No.1 and 2 retyped and replaced vide court
order dated 04.03.2026 Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.1.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5705/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE 24TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT
The legal representatives of the deceased appellant and the respondent are present.
2. The parties present a compromise petition under
Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC signed by the legal representatives of the deceased appellant, respondent and their respective counsel.
3. The contents of the compromise are read over to the parties and they admit that the terms of the compromise depict the true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out for the terms of the compromise.
4. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to place the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal.
5. Hence, the following:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50571 RFA No. 275 of 2014
ORDER i. The regular first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; ii. The office is directed to draw a modify decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19