213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33029-2025 Date of Decision: August 18, 2025 Sarwan Singh @ Sarwan Singh Fauji …Pe00oner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Gaurav Daa, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Status report by way of affidavit of Shri Riputapan Singh Sandhu, Superintendent of Police-SDPO, City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran has been filed on behalf of respondent-State. 2. On 23.06.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Inter alia contends that in the present case, no injury has been caused to any person. It is further submied that the gun of the peoner is licensed and has further submied that the peoner would surrender the same to the Invesgang Officer on the date when the peoner goes to join the invesgaon and would not seek its release ll the me the trial is concluded. It is further submied that the house of the peoner is at a distance of about 150 meters from the house of the complainant and the peoner would also not go within 100 meters of the house of the complainant. Noce of moon for 18.08.2025. In the meanme, the peoner is directed to appear before the SHO/Invesgang Officer as and when called upon to join invesgaon and in the event of arrest, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the sasfacon of SHO/ Invesgang Agency, subject to the following condions as envisaged under Secon 482(2) of the BNSS:- i) that the peoner shall make himself available for interrogaon as and when required; Sarita Rani 2025.08.18 16:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order CRM-M-33029-2025 - 2 - 2025:PHHC:106409 ii) that the peoner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him / her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) that the peoner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court. The peoner would join the invesgaon on 27.06.2025 and would surrender his gun on the said date to the Invesgang Officer and would also abide by the undertaking given before this Court. It is made clear that in case of violaon, the interim order would be liable to be vacated.” 3. Today, learned State counsel has informed this Court that the peoner has joined the invesgaon, in compliance of the order dated 23.06.2025 and is no longer required for further invesgaon. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the order dated 23.06.2025, whereby the peoner was granted interim ancipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. However, he shall connue to join invesgaon, if and so required by the Invesgang Officer. Disposed of. August 18, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.08.18 16:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order