BIJENDER SINGH v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED OTHERS
CWP/17607/2025 · 2025-07-01
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71040 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 71040 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17607-2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-17607-2025 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 Bijender Singh
......Petitioner(s) Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. R.K. Choudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate,
for the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to grant him annual increment for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24 as granted to similarly situated persons.
2. The petitioner claims that respondent has denied him benefit of increments on the ground that he had not cleared typing test. The benefit of annual increments was earlier granted, however, has been withheld for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24. The same benefit has been extended to many candidates who had not passed typing test. The petitioner has already cleared typing test, though at a later stage. The petitioner’s case is squarely covered by different orders/judgments of this Court including order dated 04.03.2025 passed by Division Bench Shivani Gupta 2025.07.01 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-17607-2025
2
of this Court in LPA-2005-2024 titled as ‘UHBVNL and others vs. Surender Kumar.
3. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in Court, assures the Court that competent authority would reconsider claim of petitioner in the light of judgments enclosed with this petition.
4. Let the matter be re-considered by competent authority by passing appropriate order within 8 weeks from today.
5.
Disposed of.
01.07.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes Whether reportable
No
Shivani Gupta 2025.07.01 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document