1 2025:CGHC:12232 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 33 of 2025 • Sunil Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Bajrang Lal Agrawal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o. Ambedkar Chowk, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ... Petitioner/Applicant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue & Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.). 3. The Collector Sarguja (Ambikapur), District Sarguja (C.G.). 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.). 5. The Tahsildar Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.). 6. Dinesh Kumar Soni, S/o Shri Hari Prasad Soni, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Ward No.12, Dutta Colony, Ambikapur, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) (Writ Petitioner). 7. Ajay Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Tarachand Agrawal, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Ward No.35, Seth Basant Lal Marg, Ambikapur, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) (Respondent No. 6 In Writ Petition). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners/Applicants : Mr. Sandeep Patel, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 5 : Ms. Mandavi Bhardwaj, P.L. For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 12/03/2025 1. Heard. 2. This Review Petition has been preferred by the applicant for review/recall of order dated 06.12.2024 passed by this Court in WPC No.6002/2024. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 3. In aforesaid order, in paras 7, 8 & 9, this Court has passed the following order:- 7. In instant case, the petitioner instead of filing application for demarcation of his said lands before respondent No.5 -the Tahsildar, he has filed application before the respondents No.2 & 3. 8. Having considered the limited prayer of the petitioner, which has not been objected by learned State Counsel, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file application under Section 129 of the Code, 1959 before respondent No.5 for demarcation of his aforesaid lands, within a period of 15 days from today. Thereafter, the respondent No.5 shall demarcate the aforesaid land, within a further period of 45 days in accordance with law. 9. With aforesaid observations and directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the fact that since, petitioner was not a party in WPC No.6002/2024 (Dinesh Kumar Soni Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others), therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this review petition. 5. Accordingly, the review petition is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. 6. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge