- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49103-DB WA No. 1520 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT APPEAL NO. 1520 OF 2024 (BDA) BETWEEN: M/S YGR CORP, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.24, KATHRIGUPPE MAIN ROAD, 80 FEET ROAD, OPP: BIG BAZAAR, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 085. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI M YOGAMURTHY, S/O SRI M CHENCHU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY. Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49103-DB WA No. 1520 of 2024 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUAMRAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING MEMBER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUAMRAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. 4. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS HOUSING COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFER SHAH, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G. LAKSHMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. H. L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.07.2024 PASSED IN WP No-10888/2023 (BDA) BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW THE WP. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49103-DB WA No. 1520 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Sri. Santosh S. Gogi, learned Additional Advocate General has submitted that the appeal has rendered infructuous, as the State has acted upon the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the writ petition. 2. In view of the above submission, the writ appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26