Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7103 (UTT)

PARVEEN AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/364/2024 · 2025-05-10

Daily Lok Adalat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3823 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/364/2024 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd. Rizwan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C.Joshi, Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat and Mr. Vipul Painuli, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGAs for the State. 3. Mr. Shariq Khursheed, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 4. Mr. Mohd. Matloob, learned Mediator. 5. This matter is taken up in the National Lok Adalat on 10.05.2025. Both the parties are present before the Court, duly identified by their respective counsels. 6. Instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against the part of the order dated 05.02.2024, passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Criminal Case No. 56 of 2021, Smt. Parveen and another, vs. Akbar Hussain, whereby learned Judge, Family Court has dismissed the application filed for maintenance of revisionist under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in respect of revisionist no.1 and partly allowed the application of the revisionist no. 2 granting a meagre amount of compensation to respondent no. 2. 2025:UHC:3823 7. Now, both the parties have settled their disputes amicably on the following terms and conditions: (i) The respondent no.2 Akbar Hussain has paid Rs. 1,00,000/- (one lakh) cash to the applicant & her minor son as full and final settlement- permanent alimony. (ii) The minor son Aadil will live with her Smt. Parveen. (iii) The Applicant/Revisionist will not claim any right on property in future. (iv) The Applicant wants to withdraw her Misc case No. 56 of 2021 Smt. Parveen & Aadil vs. Akbar Hussain u/S 125 Cr.P.C. On the basis of above facts the matter has been decided amicably. Therefore, kindly decide the case.” 8. Since the matter between both the parties have amicably been settled on the basis of compromise arrived at between them, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the present proceedings, therefore, the Criminal Revision stands disposed of on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties. 9. The settlement-deed shall form part of record. (Alok Mahra, J.) 10.05.2025 Kaushal 2025:UHC:3823