IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1782 of 2025 ------ 1. Krishankant Ghosh @ Krishna Yadav @ Krishnakanta Ghosh, Aged about- 29 years, Son of- Subal Ghosh @ Subal Chandra Ghosh, 2. Sujit Ghosh, Aged about- 23 years, Son of- Anath Ghosh, 3. Manoj Ghosh, Aged about- 24 years, Son of- Late Nandlal Ghosh @ Late Kuba Ghosh Petition No. 1 to 3 Resident of village- Bagdabra, Post Office- Bagdabra, Police Station- Farakka, District- Murshidabad, State- West Bangal. 4. Kishore Kumar Saha, Aged about- 34 years, Son of- Sadhin Saha, Resident of village- Mayurkola, 5. Shankar Saha, Aged about- 50 years, Son of- Late Ahalad Sha, Resident of village- Bijaipur, Petitioner No. 4 and 5 under Post Office and Police Station- Kotalpokhar, District- Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-19-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.11 of 2024 instituted under Sections 342/323/353/307/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant; consequent upon the informant seizing the vehicle which was involved in illegal transportation of stone chips. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is then submitted that only cut-mark on left elbow was sustained by the alleged victim which is simple in nature. Drawing attention of this court towards para-09 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake not to annoy of disturb the informant and also undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pakur in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.11 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/