Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7102 (UTT)

M/S PODDAR ISPAT PVT. LTD. v. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WPMB/305/2025 · 2025-06-10

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4722-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 10TH JUNE, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/B) No. 305 OF 2025 M/s Poddar Ispat Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Office of the Deputy Commissioner and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Rakesh Prasad Singh, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents. : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) Counsel for the petitioner submits that several errors have inadvertently crept into the drafting, and hence he prays leave of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition on the same cause of action. 2. Counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection for withdrawal of the Writ Petition and grant of liberty. 3. The submission is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition on the same cause of action within two weeks, after carrying out the necessary corrections, and furnishing better particulars. 4. Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 10th June, 2025 Rahul 1