- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49343 RFA No. 2590 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2590 OF 2007 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M MUNISWAMY SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. SMT JAYAMMA W/O LATE M.MUNISWAMY AGED 60 YEARS, 2. SMT N M SHOBHA D/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.328 RMV II STAGE, BHOVI COLONY, SANJAY NAGAR, NAGASHETTIHALLI, BANGALORE 94. 3. SRI KRISHNA MURTHY S/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.169(PORTION) RMV II STAGE, BHOVI COLONY, SANJAY NAGAR, NAGASHETTIHALLI, BANGALORE 94. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49343 RFA No. 2590 of 2007 4. SMT NIRMALA D/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 42 YERAS, R/O DODDABALLAPUR, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, 5. SMT N M CHANDRAKALA D/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O PILLANNAGARDEN, NAGASHETTIHALLI BANGALORE - 94. 6. SMT N M SUNANDA D/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED 31 YEARS, R/AT SOMANNA LAYOUT, HEBBAL NEAR NANJUNDESWARA TEMPLE, BANGALORE. 7. SMT N M RATHNAMMA D/O LATE M.MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT DODDAPPAIAH LAYOUT NAGASHETTIHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 094. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R.B. SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT N M HEMAVATHI D/O LATE SRI M.MUNISWAMY AGED 40 YERAS, R/ATNO.132, (PORTION) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49343 RFA No. 2590 of 2007 NAGASHETTIHALLI BANGALORE 560 094 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.17.11.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5336/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-8), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants. Court notice issued to respondents No.2, 3, 5 to 7 served on person. Appellant No.4 returned with an endorsement 'Insufficient address'. Insofar as first appellant is concerned, it is returned with an endorsement 'Appellant No.1 is no more'. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49343 RFA No. 2590 of 2007 Left with no alternative appeal stands dismissed for non-persecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13 CT-SG