Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7101 (RAJ)

GEETA DEVI W/O SHRI SURAJBHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2588/2025 · 2025-02-25

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8364] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2587/2025 Dataram S/o Shri Ghisa Ram, Age 58 Years, R/o Mukam Parvati Ka Mandir, Village Girudi, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Khairthal-Tijara, Alwar. 3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, Alwar. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2588/2025 Geeta Devi W/o Shri Surajbhan, Age 58 Years, R/o Sodawas Tehsil Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar. 3. The Vikas Adhikari Panchayat Samiti Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sahil Duseja for Mr. Dinesh Kala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 25/02/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:8364] (2 of 2) [CW-2587/2025] These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The orders impugned bearing No.4015 and 4016 both dated 01.02.2024 are quashed and set aside as withdrawn. 2. The respondents are at liberty to initiate proceeding against the petitioners for recovery afresh in accordance with law following the principles of natural justice. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-144-145