147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA OM PRAKASH AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Gaurav Datta, Mr. Amit HARKESH MANUJA 1. By way of present petition Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 528 of the BNSS 2023, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to protect life and personal liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of respondent Nos.5 to 8. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, hi be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representations (Annexures P petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously. 3. Prayer seems to be justified. 4. Upon adv appears on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: OM PRAKASH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 528 of the BNSS 2023, prayer has been made for issuance of direction protect life and personal liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of respondent Nos.5 to 8. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, hi be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representations (Annexures P-3 and P-5) moved petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously. Prayer seems to be justified. Upon advance notice, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6570-2025 Date of Decision: June 23, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 528 of the BNSS 2023, prayer has been made for issuance of directions to official respondents protect life and personal liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of respondent Nos.5 to 8. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to decide the 5) moved at the instance of petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 2025 June 23, 2025 Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 528 of the BNSS 2023, s protect life and personal liberty of the petitioners and their family submits s client would decide the at the instance of Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana and raises no objection to TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6570-2025 -2- 5. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Inspector General of Police, Hisar Range, to look into the representation (Annexures P-3 and P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 04 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. The aforesaid direction shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments made in the representation. 23.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document