HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20838 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not permitting the petitioner to open restaurant/food outlet from afternoon to 4.00 A.M. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted application/representation dated 15.05.2025 to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority has not paid any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising his grievance before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. September 16, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Haider Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Ankur Tyagi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad