Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7100 (PNJ)

PARVEEN BHALLA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/12199/2026 · 2026-05-18

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 206 PARVEEN BHALLA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. APS Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal R. Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY 1. The present petition has been filed under Section for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 10.09.2025, under Sections registered at Police Station 2. On 3. Learned mentioned order, cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: PARVEEN BHALLA Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. APS Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal R. Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. , under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS (Sections 406 and 420 IPC) registered at Police Station Sector 7, Panchkula. On 04.05.2026, this Court had passed “Learned Senior counsel inter alia civil dispute between petitioner and one Suresh Jain regarding amount paid for demolition of plant and machinery in terms of an agreement. He has clean antecedents and join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Adjourned to 18.05.2026. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 11.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.” Learned Senior counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12199-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. APS Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal R. Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.153, dated 316(2), 318(4) BNS (Sections 406 and 420 IPC) Sector 7, Panchkula. , this Court had passed the following order:- inter alia submits that it is a case of civil dispute between petitioner and one Suresh Jain regarding amount paid for demolition of plant and machinery in terms of an agreement. He has clean antecedents and ready &willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating , the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 11.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be ” el submits that in pursuance of the afore the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the 482 BNSS, 2023, , dated 316(2), 318(4) BNS (Sections 406 and 420 IPC) submits that it is a case of civil dispute between petitioner and one Suresh Jain regarding amount paid for demolition of plant and machinery in terms of willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating , the petitioner is directed to join the investigation shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be el submits that in pursuance of the afore- the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.19 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-12199-2026 -2- investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Ashish affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner on 08.05.2026 and cooperating with the investigating agency. His specimen signatures have been taken on 15.05.2026. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 04.05.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 18.05.2026 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.19 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.