Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36287 WP No. 3265 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3265 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
SMT. LALITHAMMA, W/O LATE GANGARANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT HUTHRIDURGA VILLAGE, HUTHRIDURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVIKUMARA B R.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU SUB DIVISION, TUMAKURU - 572 101.
4.
THE TAHASILDHAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU - 572 132. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36287 WP No. 3265 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 TO TAHASILDAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 23.12.2022 VIDE ANNX-F AND LEGAL NOTICE DTD.10.12.2024 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER TO REVIEW / RECONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO GRANT THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 125 MEASURING 2 ACRES SITUATED AT HUTHRIDURGA VILLAGE AND HUTHRIDURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK UNDER THE BAGAR HUKKUM SCHEME VIDE ANNX-H.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the Assistant Commissioner, Tumakuru Sub-Division, setting aside the order of rejection at the hands of the Committee for regularization of unauthorised occupation and remanding the matter back to the Tahasildhar, Kunigal Taluk, to place the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36287 WP No. 3265 of 2025 application before the committee for reconsideration, the Tahasildhar has not taken any action.
3. Having regard to the innocuous prayer made in the writ petition, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4-Tahasildhar Kunigal Taluk to place the application of the petitioner before the committee for regularization of unauthorised occupation for reconsideration in terms of the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner, in proceedings bearing No.R.A.9/09-10 dated 17.07.2013 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. The Committee shall thereafter take a decision within a period of two months. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19