Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70979 (PNJ)

HARWINDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6588/2025 · 2025-06-23

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6588-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 153 CRWP-6588-2025 Decided on: 23.06.2025 Harwinder Kumar and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Anil K. Sohal, Advocate for Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. (appeared on advance notice) **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. 1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. The details, relevant for decision of the present petition, are tabulated as under:- Petitioner No. 1 Petitioner No. 2 Name(s) Harwinder Kumar Neetu Bala Age (in years) 36 years 32 years Date of marriage 13.06.2025 Rite Hindu Rites Representation dated 14.06.2025 Submitted to Respondent No.2-The Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, Punjab Family members arrayed as Respondent No.5 RASHMI 2025.06.23 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6588-2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 is a widower, and his first wife passed away on 01.01.2023. It is further submitted that the petitioners have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their family members, who are threatening and interfering in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. It is the first marriage of both the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, wherein, they have expressed their apprehension. 4. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 5. On asking of the Court, learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent – State. Let requisite copies of the complete paper book be supplied to learned State counsel during course of the day. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police Amritsar, to look into the representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), qua threat perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. 7. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 23.06.2025 JUDGE rashmi Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.06.23 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document