MEHFOOZ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH THE S.S.P. HARIDWAR
BA3/38/2024 · 2025-06-30
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7097 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7097 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Third Bail Application No. 38 of 2024
Mehfooz
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 590 of 2022, under Sections 395 and 412 IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. This is the third bail application of the applicant. His first bail application was rejected on merits on 12.03.2023. His second bail application was also dismissed on 15.03.2024.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the third bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
2
4.
The third bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
30.06.2025 Jitendra