IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 337 of 2025 Date of Decision : 9.7.2025 Vivek Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Pawan Kumar Banyal ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate. For respondent : M/s Parul Negi and Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocates. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the present petition is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the objection raised, he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 9th July, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.