Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70962 (KAR)

SMT LAKSHMAMMA v. SRI H D ANIL KUMAR

MFA/3781/2025 · 2025-09-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 3781/2025 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8894/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O CHIKKAHONNAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS SRI. CHIKKAHONNAIAH S/O LATE KEMPAHONNAIAH (DEAD, HENCE NOT MADE PARTY IN THE APPEAL, APPELLANT NO. 1 TO 3 ARE LR'S OF DECEASED) 2. CHI. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS 3. CHI. NANDISHA S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS APPELLANT NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN 2 GRAND-MOTHER, I.E. 1ST APPELLANT ALL ARE RESIDING AT: GUJJENAHALLI VILLAGE HUTHRIDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 126. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI H D ANIL KUMAR S/O DEVARAJU MAJOR (AGE OF R-1 NOT KNOWN TO APPELLANTS) RESIDING AT: HOSAPETE VILLAGE HULIYURUDURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 123 2. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.48, 3RD FLOOR, SS CORNER BUILDING HOSPITAL ROAD (NEXT TO KAMATH HOTEL) SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560 001 BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C.SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE, FOR R2) 3 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.01.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.133/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT-3, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.3,10,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Ten Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK