SHUBH RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6642/2025 · 2025-07-17
Sanjay Vashisth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70959 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70959 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRWP-6642-2025 Decided on : 17.07.2025 Shubh Rani and another . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manjinder S. Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH
, J. (Oral)
1. In the present case, on 23.06.2025, following order was passed:-
“1. Petitioners, i.e., Shubh Rani – 22 years, and Krishan Lal – 25 years, have filed the instant protection petition, by pleading that both of them are living in a live-in relationship.
2. Petitioner No.1 is stated to be earlier married to one Balwinder Kumar (respondent No.4 ) on 30.11.2012. Out of said wedlock two children, i.e., Raghav Ramotra (now aged 7 years) and Aditya (now aged 9 years) were borne. It is noticed that both the petitioners and respondent No.4 are primarily residents of the State of Himachal Pradesh.
3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners to clear the position on the maintainability of the present petition.
4. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 17.07.2025.”
2. Today, on the very outset, counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of present petition.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 17, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.07.18 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document