Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70959 (ALL)

RAM CHANDER PATEL AND 3 OTHERS v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/19704/2024 · 2025-08-22

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146427 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19704 of 2024 Applicant :- Ram Chander Patel And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Akansha Verma,Anemash Kumar Kushwaha,G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anemash Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri B. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State- opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of the S.T. No.1156 of 2013(State Vs. Ram Chandra Patel & Others), arising out of Case Crime No.207 of 2012, under sections 323, 325, 308, 504, IPC, Police Station Phulpur, District Allahabad, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 13.09.2012, pending in the court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, 1st, Allahabad, on the basis of compromise dated 01.07.2023. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 7 In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of the S.T. No.1156 of 2013(State Vs. Ram Chandra Patel & Others), arising out of Case Crime No.207 of 2012, under sections 323, 325, 308, 504, IPC, Police Station Phulpur, District Allahabad, as well as impugned charge sheet dated 13.09.2012, pending in the court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, 1st, Allahabad, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad