Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70957 (PNJ)

LADPREET SINGH ALIAS LADI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33066/2025 · 2025-07-07

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

247 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33066-2025 Date of Decision:07.07.2025 Ladpreet Singh @ Ladi …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Shahid Anwer Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in a case FIR No. 36, dated 23.02.2025, under Sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 190,191(3) of B.N.S, Section 117(2) of B.N.S added later on, registered at Police Station Amargarh, District Malerkotla. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as per the com- plainant, the petitioner was armed with Gandasa and had caused injury with a fist on the lips of the complainant. He further contends that in fact, the allega- tions levelled by the complainant are highly unbelievable. Even the injured Harpreet Singh had suffered four injuries and only one injury has been declared to be grievous in nature, which has been attributed to the main accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in the present case, similarly placed co-accused Lovepreet Singh and Purbdeep Singh @ HITESH 2025.07.08 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-33066-2025 -2 Prabhdeep Singh have been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order (Annexure P-3). The petitioner is in custody for the last more than 04 months. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that four more cases were ordered to be registered against the petitioner. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully in the present case. 5. In fact, Harpreet Singh, injured had suffered four injuries and the injury which is attributed to the petitioner has been declared to be simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody for the last about 04 months. Moreover, two co-accused namely Lovepreet Singh and Purbdeep Singh @ Prabhdeep Singh, who were assigned similar roles, have been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court. 6. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 07.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.08 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh