HANSIRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/6608/2025 · 2025-06-23
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70949 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70949 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
154
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HANSIRA AND ANOTHER
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for Ms. Manpreet,
Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA
1. Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 Constitution of protection to their life and liberty, in view of the marriage solemnized by them against the wishes of respondent
2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana of respondents No.1 already been supplied to the State by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Paper was solemnized on annexed by the petitioners with the petition including their Cards (Annexures P identified by liberty at the hands o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
HANSIRA AND ANOTHER
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for Ms. Manpreet, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners praying for protection to their life and liberty, in view of the marriage solemnized by them against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 7 Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana of respondents No.1 to 3 and requisite copies of the petition have already been supplied to the State by the learned counsel for the Paper-book reveals that marriage of petitioners No.1 and 2 was solemnized on 11.06.2025 (Annexure annexed by the petitioners with the petition including their Annexures P-2 and P-3) show that their counsel, but apprehending danger to their life and erty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6608-2025 Date of Decision: June 23, 2025
........Petitioners
........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the India has been filed by the petitioners praying for protection to their life and liberty, in view of the marriage solemnized by s No.4 to 7. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf to 3 and requisite copies of the petition have already been supplied to the State by the learned counsel for the book reveals that marriage of petitioners No.1 and 2 11.06.2025 (Annexure P-1).
The documents annexed by the petitioners with the petition including their Aadhar that both are major and duly but apprehending danger to their life and to 7. 2025 June 23, 2025 of the India has been filed by the petitioners praying for protection to their life and liberty, in view of the marriage solemnized by behalf to 3 and requisite copies of the petition have already been supplied to the State by the learned counsel for the book reveals that marriage of petitioners No.1 and 2 . The documents Aadhar duly but apprehending danger to their life and TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6608-2025
-2-
5. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, petitioners have already approached respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Nuh by way of representation dated 11.06.2025 , who shall look into the same and in case he finds any threat perception to the petitioners, appropriate steps be taken to protect their life and liberty. 6. Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Nuh, to look into the matter and ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners by forcibly taking them in custody on the allegations that petitioner No.1 has been kidnapped, abducted or raped by petitioner No.2. 7. However, it is made clear that this order may not be construed as expression of an opinion on legality and validity of the marriage of the petitioners. 8. In case any criminal case is pending against petitioner No.2, this order shall not be any hindrance for the Investigating agency to proceed according to law. 23.06.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document