IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRWP-6558-2025 Decided on : 23.06.2025 Ali and another . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manjinder S. Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. 2. Neither there is marriage certificate, nor any identity proof or even the document of proof of age of petitioner No.2. Even marriage certificate dated 11.06.2025 is appended as Annexure P-3, however, same does not disclose the any such fact that petitioners have performed marriage/nikah. Besides, respondent No.6 – Raju s/o Bashir Ahmed, is resident of r/o District Kathua (J&K). 3. Faced with the situation, counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with all the required facts and documents. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as sought and recorded here- above. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE June 23, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.06.23 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document