Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70929 (PNJ)

MOHINDER SINGH @ MAHENDER SINGH v. UHBVNL AND ORS.

CWP/16716/2023 · 2025-09-16

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 252 Mohinder Singh @ Mahender Singh Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited Panchkula CORAM: Present : HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of order in the nature of recovery of an amount of Rs.108045/ gratuity of the petitioner vide office memo GPO No.9352/UHBVNL/P dated 24.12.2012 (Annexure P 2. appearance dismissed in default miscellaneous application(s), if any, September P.C 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Mohinder Singh @ Mahender Singh VERSUS Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited Panchkula HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None for the petitioner. Mr.Akash Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of in the nature of certiorari for quashing recovery of an amount of Rs.108045/- deducted by the respondent from the gratuity of the petitioner vide office memo GPO No.9352/UHBVNL/P dated 24.12.2012 (Annexure P-6). Today, the present case was called twice but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution miscellaneous application(s), if any, September 16, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. : HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16716-2023 Date of Decision: September 16, 2025 .....Petitioner VERSUS Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited Panchkula and others ...Respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr.Akash Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ or certiorari for quashing/setting aside the impugned deducted by the respondent from the gratuity of the petitioner vide office memo GPO No.9352/UHBVNL/P-9699 Today, the present case was called twice but none has put in . Hence, the present writ petition is for want of prosecution, so also the pending (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Yes/No , 2025 .....Petitioner ...Respondents of or the impugned deducted by the respondent from the 9699 Today, the present case was called twice but none has put in . Hence, the present writ petition is , so also the pending (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.19 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document