Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70929 (KAR)

SANJAY @ SANJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/586/2023 · 2025-11-17

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46988 CRL.RP No. 586 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 586 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SANJAY @ SANJU S/O LATE RAVI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC BEKARY WORK, R/AT GUDDENAHALLI KOPPALU, BELUR ROAD, HASSAN -572 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HASSAN SUB DIVISION, HASSAN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 572 301. 2. POLICE INSPECTOR, PENSION MOHALLA POLICE STATION, HASSAN DISTRICT, REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER MAG/146/2022-23 DTD 29-04-2023 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN SUB-DIVISION RESPONDENT NO.1, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE RP., AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS MAY DEEM FIT, UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46988 CRL.RP No. 586 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 29.04.2023 bearing no.JA.J.f 146/2022-23 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Hassan Sub- Division, Hassan, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Pratheep K.C., learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for 17 days i.e., from 29.04.2023 to 15.05.2023, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent. 3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission. 4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52