MANDEEP BHARDWAJ AND ORS v. K.A.P. SINHA , IAS AND ORS
COCP/1904/2026 · 2026-05-18
Ramesh Kumari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE H
116
MANDEEP BH
K.A.P. SINHA A
CORAM: HO Present : Mr
Mr.
1.
Learned counsel
29.07.2025 rend
representation da
decided so far de
2. Notice of motion
3. Mr. Balwinder S the petition on b the aforesaid rep be decided by res
4. In view of above respondent No.4 (Annexure P-2) representation is be at liberty to re
Whether spea
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No Date of de P BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS
Versus HA AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate for the
Mr. Balwinder Singh, A.A.G., Punja
**** , J. (oral) unsel for the petitioners submitted tha rendered in CWP-21452-2025, tion dated 22.08.2025 (Annexure P despite the lapse of more than six otion. nder Singh, A.A.G., Punjab who has a n on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 aid representation (Annexure P-2) sub by respondent No.4, expeditiously. above, the present petition is dispose t No.4 to decide the aforesaid rep 2) within a period of 15 days fro tion is not decided within the stipulate y to revive the present contempt petitio speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whe AB AND HARYANA RH No.1904 of 2026 e of decision: 18.05.2026
…. Petitioners
…. Respondents
for the petitioners
, Punjab. ted that in compliance of order dated 025, the petitioners had filed a re P-2) but the same has not been an six months. o has appeared on advance notice of 1 to 4, on instructions, submits that 2) submitted by the petitioners will
isposed of while giving directions to id representation dated 22.08.2025 ys from today and in case, the said pulated period, the petitioners would t petition. hether reportable : Yes/No
ated a been ce of that will ns to 2025 said ould JYOTI 2026.05.19 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document