Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7092 (PNJ)

MANDEEP BHARDWAJ AND ORS v. K.A.P. SINHA , IAS AND ORS

COCP/1904/2026 · 2026-05-18

Ramesh Kumari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE H 116 MANDEEP BH K.A.P. SINHA A CORAM: HO Present : Mr  Mr.   1. Learned counsel 29.07.2025 rend representation da decided so far de 2. Notice of motion 3. Mr. Balwinder S the petition on b the aforesaid rep be decided by res 4. In view of above respondent No.4 (Annexure P-2) representation is be at liberty to re    Whether spea HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH COCP No Date of de P BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS Versus HA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE  Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate for the       Mr. Balwinder Singh, A.A.G., Punja ****  , J. (oral) unsel for the petitioners submitted tha rendered in CWP-21452-2025, tion dated 22.08.2025 (Annexure P despite the lapse of more than six otion. nder Singh, A.A.G., Punjab who has a n on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 aid representation (Annexure P-2) sub by respondent No.4, expeditiously. above, the present petition is dispose t No.4 to decide the aforesaid rep 2) within a period of 15 days fro tion is not decided within the stipulate y to revive the present contempt petitio        speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whe AB AND HARYANA RH No.1904 of 2026 e of decision: 18.05.2026 …. Petitioners …. Respondents   for the petitioners , Punjab. ted that in compliance of order dated 025, the petitioners had filed a re P-2) but the same has not been an six months. o has appeared on advance notice of 1 to 4, on instructions, submits that 2) submitted by the petitioners will isposed of while giving directions to id representation dated 22.08.2025 ys from today and in case, the said pulated period, the petitioners would t petition.      hether reportable : Yes/No ated a been ce of that will ns to 2025 said ould  JYOTI 2026.05.19 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document