CM-8959-CWP-2025 and CM-8960-CWP-2025 in/and RA-CW-270-2025 in CWP-4304-2022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (118) CM-8959-CWP-2025 and CM-8960-CWP-2025 in/and RA-CW-270-2025 in CWP-4304-2022 Date of Decision : 02.07.2025 Surender Pal Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Faridabad and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advocate with Ms. Mansi, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) CM-8959-CWP-2025 Present application has been filed for seeking condonation of delay of 17 days in filing the review petition. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and delay of 17 days in filing the review petition is condoned. CM-8960-CWP-2025 Application is allowed, as prayed for. RA-CW-270-2025 1. The present petition is for review of the order dated 04.03.2025. The order dated 04.03.2025, the review of which is sought, is as under :- Kanchan 2025.07.03 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CM-8959-CWP-2025 and CM-8960-CWP-2025 in/and RA-CW-270-2025 in CWP-4304-2022 2 “1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have already settled the issue which is clear from the order dated 18.05.2024 passed in CWP No. 16173 of 2019, between the same parties, hence, the present petition be also disposed of in terms of the said settlement. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.” 2. A bare perusal of the order would show that the same was passed in the presence of the parties and that too on the instructions of the counsel for the petitioner. Now, the prayer of the petitioner is that his claim was not covered by the order dated 18.05.2024 passed in CWP No. 16173 of 2019. The contradictory stand is being taken to as a ground recall the order dated 04.03.2025. Once, the statement was made on behalf of the petitioner on the basis of which the writ petition was disposed of, no ground is made out for any review of the same. 3. Dismissed. July 02, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No Kanchan 2025.07.03 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment