- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50225 WP No. 16936 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 16936 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MANJULA W/O LATE K RAGHUNATH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT 5TH CROSS, SRI SHIRDHI LAYOUT, BEHIND KRISHNA COMMUNITY HALL AYYAPPA NAGAR, K R PURAM BENGALURU - 560 036. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH DIVISION, 200(S) KANDAYA BHAVAN, 2ND FLOOR, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 2. SRI D A SRINIVAS S/O LATE D K ADIKESHAVULU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST CROSS, 9TH MAIN, R.M.V.EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 080 Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50225 WP No. 16936 of 2025 3. THE TAHSILDAR K R PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 036 4. M/S SAPTHAGIRI ENTERPRISES HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 17, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020 R/BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRINIVAS AUDIKESHAVULU DALAVAI 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR K R PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 560 036 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1, R3 AND R5; SMT. JAYASHEELA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2) *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER, DIRECTING R1 TO PRODUCE THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.02.2025, PASSED IN RA (BE) NO. 658/2024 BY R1, BY CONSIDERING THE COPY APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 11.03.2025 (ANNEXURE-A) THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50225 WP No. 16936 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo and submits that the impugned order dated 13.02.2025 passed in RA(BE)No.658/2024 has been challenged before the Special Deputy Commissioner in R.P.No.377/2025. 2. The memo is taken on record. It reads as follows:- "The advocate for petitioner most humbly prays that the impugned order dated 13.02.2025 passed by respondent No.1 is challenged by petitioner before Special Deputy Commissioner-1 in RP No.377/2025. Hence, in view of the same, above petition became infructuous. This Hon'ble Court may please to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present petition by permitting to make all allegations made in this petition before Special Deputy Commissioner-1 in RP No.377/2025. Hence, the same may please be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity with a liberty to file fresh petition (sic), if need be." 3. In light of the same, petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication. All contentions are kept open to be considered in R.P.No.377/2025. It is clarified that there has been no adjudication in the present proceedings. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR