Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7088 (UTT)

ANUJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1102/2021 · 2025-03-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1102 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painly, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter on 13.03.2022, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.03.2025 SK