Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7088 (RAJ)

KALU SINGH S/O TOOFAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2256/2025 · 2025-02-24

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8292] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2256/2025 Kalu Singh S/o Toofan Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Danta Ka Khera, Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Bhawani Mandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Adv. Mr. Shubham Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2025, registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/20 and 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity of 5 kg 660 gram Ganja recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner is below commercial quantity. It is also contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:8292] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2256/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the alleged quantity of 5 kg 660 gram Ganja recovered from the possession of the accused- petitioner is below commercial quantity, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Kalu Singh S/o Toofan Singh, in connection with FIR No.35/2025, registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-272